Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484318›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Proposed dense variational autoencoder model integrated with contrastive learning for foot ulcer classification.

Gunjan Shandilya, Sheifali Gupta, Deepali Gupta, Sapna Juneja, Krishnaraj Chadaga, Ali Nauman, Abeer A Al-Masri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gunjan ShandilyaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Sheifali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Deepali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Sapna JunejaKrishna Institute of Engineering & Technology (KIET), Ghaziabad, Delhi NCR, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Krishnaraj ChadagaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. krishnaraj.chadaga@manipal.edu.
Ali NaumanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si, Republic of Korea. anauman@ynu.ac.kr.
Abeer A Al-MasriDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most serious complication of diabetes, Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), can result in chronic infection, damage to tissues, and even amputation if not identified in a timely way. It is even more dangerous for disabled people. Accurate and timely diagnosis is therefore essential for improved patient outcomes. However, it is difficult to perform a manual assessment of DFU images due to variations in the textures of ulcers, light effects, and severities. Herein is presented an enhanced deep learning framework DenseNet121 with Variational Autoencoder and Contrastive Learning (DenseVAE-CL) which incorporates DenseNet121 to extract robust features and integrates a Variational Autoencoder together with Contrastive Learning to enhance representation discrimination. The model was trained and tested on 2,673 publicly available images from the Kaggle DFU dataset, which was divided into training, validation, and testing subsets in a ratio of 80:10:10, respectively. DenseVAE-CL emerged as the best performer with an accuracy of 99.6%, precision of 99.5%, recall of 99.4%, specificity of 100%, sensitivity of 98.9%, an F1-score of 99.5%, and 0.99 Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC). Five-fold cross-validation further demonstrated stable generalization with a mean accuracy of 99.4 ± 0.2%. Moreover, calibration analysis confirmed the model’s reliability since a mean confidence of 0.9031 for abnormal cases and 0.9692 for normal cases results in an expected calibration error of 0.0457. Visualization through Grad-CAM and VAE residual heatmaps revealed sharp localization of ulcer regions, hence improving interpretability.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetic FootFoot UlcerImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAutoencoderHumansAutomated DFU detectionBYOL (Bootstrap your own latent)Contrastive learning (CL)Deep learning (DL)DenseNet121Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU)Medical image classificationVariational autoencoder (VAE)

Identifiers

PMID41484318
PMCPMC12859069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.