ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable judgment prediction and article-violation analysis using deep LexFaith hierarchical BERT model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence has already changed every sphere of our lives and legal field is not an exception as cases are being prepared by analyzing content of legal documents. Traditional machine learning and deep learning models lack to comprehend the complex language and infer legal reasoning required in such tasks. In this research work, our aims to predict which legal violation has occurred and also to specific articles or legal rights have been violated. To achieve the objectives, we propose architecture named Legal Faithfulness-Aware Hierarchical BERT (LexFaith-HierBERT), which integrates a hierarchical BERT-based encoder with a relational rationale head and a faithfulness-aware attention mechanism. The proposed model captures both inter- and intra-token dependencies, offering deeper contextual understanding and thus improved transparency in predictions. The proposed approach significantly outperforms several baseline methods from the existing studies including machine learning and deep learning including transformers. Empirical results demonstrate that proposed model achieves the highest accuracy of 88% for binary classification and a leading micro-F1 score of 71% for multi-label classification. Statistical significance tests prove legal reliability of the proposed system in real-world applications and model interpretation is carried out using LIME, SHAP values and attention heatmaps, to enhance the transparency and explainability of proposed model for decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.