ArticleScientific reports2026
YOLO-based deep learning framework for real-time multi-class plant health monitoring in precision agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A learning-dynamics-driven framework for robust small-object detection in complex field environments: YOLOv11l-AGRI-EMA framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of a Novel Convolution to Interactive Capture and Recalibration Enhancement Module for Underwater Fish Detection in Sensor Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Anisotropic boundary-aware detection for cotton leaf diseases with boundary-decoupled regression and lightweight feature adaptation.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-time, accurate assessment of crop conditions is key to effective decision-making in precision agriculture. This study proposes an enhanced deep-learning framework that jointly investigates YOLOv8 and the newly released YOLOv11 object-detection architectures for multi-class leaf-health monitoring. A curated dataset of 5000 high-resolution images annotated as healthy, stressed, or damaged was collected across diverse species, growth stages, and lighting conditions. An end-to-end training pipeline was developed featuring extensive geometric, colour, cut-out, and mosaic augmentations; transfer-learning from COCO weights; and GPU-accelerated fine-tuning for 50 epochs. To underpin reproducibility, we provide a compact mathematical formulation (15 equations) that details bounding-box prediction, objectness scoring, class-probability estimation, and the composite CIoU-based loss. On the held-out test set YOLOv11 achieves a mean Average Precision of 93.3% (mAP@0.5) and 76.5% (mAP@0.5:0.95), surpassing YOLOv8 (92.0%/75.2%). Precision–Recall AUC improves from 0.931 to 0.947, while small-object recall rises by 3.4 pp. Inference latency is 15 ms per image on an RTX 3060 (YOLOv11) versus 12 ms for YOLOv8, maintaining real-time throughput (> 60 FPS). An ablation study confirms that full augmentation yields an additional + 1.3 pp mAP gain. Qualitative analyses illustrate tighter bounding boxes and fewer misclassifications between stressed and damaged classes with YOLOv11. These findings demonstrate that YOLOv11’s architectural refinements deliver measurable accuracy gains with only a modest computational overhead, making it preferable where detection fidelity is paramount. Remaining challenges occlusions, visually ambiguous symptoms, and domain shift are analysed, and mitigation strategies (multi-spectral inputs, temporal modelling, and edge-side quantisation) are proposed. The proposed framework, validated with meticulous metrics and consistent mathematical approaches, this framework creates a dependable baseline for AI-driven plant health monitoring in advanced agricultural ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.