ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of crow search algorithm using the characteristics of qubits and application of engineering problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, researchers have attempted to develop a new algorithm by combining quantum systems and metaheuristics algorithms and are confirming its applicability in engineering optimization problems. This paper proposes a new QbCSA (quantum-based crow search algorithm) combining quantum systems and CSA (crow search algorithm). Unlike CSA, the initial matrix of QbCSA consists of qubits and performs operations through spin and measurement processes. Six benchmark functions were used to compare the convergence performance according to the parameter change used in the developed QbCSA, and the optimal parameter range is suggested. In addition, the CEC2019 benchmark functions and four engineering example problems were solved and compared with the results of previous studies. QbCSA demonstrated comparable performance to CSA, which uses decimal-based design variables, while achieving lower variance and more stable convergence than QbHSA. In particular, for multimodal optimization problems, QbCSA exhibited superior search efficiency and solution diversity. Furthermore, the four engineering examples confirmed the practical applicability of QbCSA, and these results indicate that qubit-based encoding can enhance the search efficiency of CSA and suggest broader applicability to engineering optimization problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.