ArticleCommunications biology2026
Endemic penetrance of SARS-CoV-2 has impacted marginally on immunity to spike protein of human coronaviruses.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has emerged as the 5th endemic coronavirus and immunological cross protection between coronaviruses will influence their infectivity and clinical impact. We determined adaptive immunity against the spike protein of each human coronavirus during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. A characteristic pattern of HCoV immunodominance, dominated by OC43 and 229E, was apparent prior to SARS-CoV-2 and was largely unaffected by SARS-CoV-2 infection, which itself elicited moderate antibody titre. Vaccination or hybrid immunity elicited supraphysiological levels of coronavirus-specific antibodies, only a proportion of which was cross-reactive with SARS-CoV-2 spike indicating substantial backboosting of HCoV-specific responses. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination focused antibody responses against the S1 domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike whilst T cell responses recognised peptides equivalently across S1 and S2. Coronavirus-specific T cells exhibited strong production of IFN-γ, IL-2 and CXCL8. In summary, the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into its ecological niche has impacted marginally on relative immunity against other human coronaviruses although vaccination provides a modest antibody increment which is unlikely to be maintained. Further, although SARS-CoV-2 vaccination elicits spike-specific adaptive immune responses that are focused against the S1 domain, thereby favouring neutralising antibodies, the natural history of HCoV immunity indicates that adaptive responses may transition towards S2 recognition across the life course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.