Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484216›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Secretary bird optimization algorithm incorporating independent thinking mechanism and sine-square step length for feature selection.

Xiaoping Zhang, Liang Tang, Suling Hou, Weixia Gui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoping ZhangSchool of Computer, Electronics and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.
Liang TangSchool of Computer, Electronics and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China. tlalis@163.com.
Suling HouDepartment of Electronic and Information Engineering, Rizhao Polytechnic, Rizhao, 276826, China.
Weixia GuiSchool of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning, 530004, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An improved Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm (ISSBOA) is proposed. First, an independent thinking mechanism (IM) enhances the algorithm's ability to avoid local optima traps and broadens global exploration during the optimization process. Second, a sine-square step size mechanism (SM) dynamically adjusts the search step size, effectively balancing the performance deficiencies of the Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm (SBOA) in both the exploration and exploitation phases. To validate the effectiveness of ISSBOA, simulations are conducted on the IEEE CEC2017 benchmark test suite, with comparisons made against 7 classic metaheuristic algorithms and seven recently proposed improved algorithms. The results demonstrate that ISSBOA achieves optimal performance in two sets of comparison experiments: when compared with the 7 standard algorithms, ISSBOA outperforms them in terms of average fitness value on 23 out of 30 test functions and in terms of variance on 16 functions, achieving an average Friedman test rank of 1.80 (securing first place); when compared with the 7 high-efficiency improved algorithms, it excels in average fitness value on 19 functions and in variance on 15 functions, with an average Friedman test rank of 2.73 (ranking first). This indicates that the proposed ISSBOA has both high optimization accuracy and strong robustness. Additionally, an adaptive transformation function is used to convert the continuous-domain ISSBOA into a binary version (BISSBOA) for discrete optimization tasks such as feature selection. To validate the performance of BISSBOA, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted using 20 public datasets with different dimensions, and comparisons are made against 7 high-performance feature selection algorithms. The results show that BISSBOA outperforms the other comparative algorithms across five evaluation metrics, thereby confirming its practicality and superiority in the field of feature selection.

Indexed as

Feature selectionIndependent thinking mechanismSecretary bird optimization algorithmSine-square step size mechanism

Identifiers

PMID41484216
PMCPMC12855948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.