ArticleScientific reports2026
Trust and class aware service discovery with dual control in the social Internet of Things.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Service discovery in the Social Internet of Things (SIoT) must be both efficient and trustworthy. Dense device graphs and heterogeneous link reliability make naïve traversal ineffective and risk-prone. We address this by constructing an Individual's Small-World SIoT (ISWSIoT) search space via a trust threshold α and proposing a class- and trust-based informed search algorithm that combines deterministic neighbor ranking, class-aware (friendship) selection, Top-K exploration, a hop bound H, and a selective fallback mechanism. This dual control (α and K) is designed to balance reliability and exploration while bounding search depth. We posit and evaluate four hypotheses: (H1) setting [Formula: see text] improves discovery relative to permissive thresholds; (H2) α-filtering with Top-K reduces exploration cost (visited nodes) while preserving short paths and low latency; (H3) increasing K and H boosts success with only moderate latency overhead; and (H4) fallback restores progress under strict trust filtering with limited cost. Experiments on five real-world graphs perform an SIoT-style α-profiling of success, hops, latency, visited nodes, and LCC ratio. The results show that discovery improves from permissive to moderate α and stabilizes near [Formula: see text]; visited nodes decrease as α rises, while hops remain modest and latency low; larger K and H increase success with moderate latency increases; and fallback recovers discovery when strict α yields few eligible neighbors. Runtime measurements indicate that the proposed method is competitive-often fastest on larger graphs-relative to standard graph searches. Overall, the findings validate the hypotheses and demonstrate that a trust- and class-aware, dual-controlled discovery algorithm provides effective, efficient, and robust service discovery in SIoT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.