ArticleScientific reports2026
Contactless biometric verification from in-air signatures using deep siamese networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-air signature is a behavioral biometric trait that has gained increasing attention in recent years due to its contactless nature and potential for secure, hygienic, and remote authentication. Unlike traditional pen-and-paper or tablet-based systems, in-air signature methods capture signing gestures in three-dimensional space, typically using fingertip tracking or depth sensing, offering greater flexibility and accessibility in various application contexts. In this study, we developed a deep learning-based biometric verification model using in-air signature data collected from 25 participants. The collected dataset was structured into 200 positive (same-person) and negative (different-person) signature pairs, capturing both inter-person and intra-person variability. A Siamese Neural Network architecture based on Bidirectional LSTM layers and contrastive loss was used to learn a discriminative embedding space for signature verification. To rigorously evaluate generalization capability across users, we employed a customized cross-validation protocol based on the Leave Two Sample Out (LTSO) approach, a more stringent variation of the traditional Leave One Sample Out (LOSO) method, resulting in 300 unique train-test splits. The proposed system achieved strong overall performance, with an average accuracy of 85%, F1-score of 85%, and recall of 91%, indicating its effectiveness even with limited training data. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using in-air signatures as a practical, contactless biometric modality and support the viability of Siamese neural networks for learning person-specific patterns in motion-based verification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.