ArticleScientific reports2026
A retrospective cluster analysis of regional disparities and healthcare factors influencing causes of death certification and mortality statistics in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable cause-specific mortality statistics are crucial for defining health priorities, public health programs, allocating resources, designing and implementing policies to improve healthcare quality and accessibility. India accounts for almost 18 percent of the world's population. The 2020 report from the Office of the Registrar General of India indicates that the Medical Certification of Cause of Death (MCCD) rate is only 22.5%, with a minimal improvement of just 2.5% over the past decade. This study is the first to provide a comprehensive evaluation of MCCD-patterns across India over the past 15 years, addressing a critical-gap in the literature by identifying regional patterns, disparities, and healthcare variables that have previously been underexplored. Based on MCCD-trends over this period, the states and Union-Territories of India can be categorized into three clusters. Cluster1 includes 23 states with the lowest-average MCCD-rate of 18%, attributed to a low 0.14 doctors per 1000 people, with only 27.4% of hospitals actively reporting-MCCD. In contrast, Clusters2 and 3 have higher-average MCCD-rates of 63% and 60%, respectively, supported by higher 0.27 and 0.33 doctors per 1000 people, with over 80% of hospitals actively reporting-MCCD. Although, the findings indicate that active MCCD-reporting is a major factor associated with MCCD rates, other factors including healthcare infrastructure, state-specific healthcare policies, socioeconomic factors, and administrative management also influence MCCD-rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.