ArticleScientific reports2026
Supervised machine learning models for predicting student mathematics performance in Somaliland primary examinations 2023.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The declining mathematics performance among primary school students in Somaliland, as evidenced by the increasing failure rate from 51.9% in 2020 to 65.58% in 2023, has prompted the need to investigate the influencing factors and potential predictive models. This study leverages data from the 2022/2023 Somaliland National Examinations to identify and analyze these factors. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of various supervised machine learning models in predicting mathematics performance among primary school students and identify the factors contributing to performance disparities. Data were drawn from the 2022/2023 Somaliland National Examination database, which covered 20,950 students. Six supervised machine learning models- logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, Naïve Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)-were applied to predict student performance. Performance metrics, such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC, were used to evaluate the models. Significant regional and demographic differences were observed between the groups. Regions such as Awdal and Maroodi Jeeh showed high failure rates, whereas the Sheekh and Sanaag regions demonstrated higher success rates than the others. Males (67.17%) failed more frequently than females (63.52%), and urban schools (67.64%) performed worse than rural schools (45.21%). The Naïve Bayes model achieved the highest accuracy of 98.6%, followed by the KNN model at 80.3%. Other models, such as Random Forest and Logistic Regression, demonstrated moderate success, whereas SVM performed the least effectively. The findings indicate that regional, sex, and school-type disparities significantly influence mathematics performance. The Naive Bayes model was the most effective in predicting performance, and these insights can be used for targeted interventions to improve the educational outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.