ArticleScientific reports2026
A prospective cohort study develops and validates a machine learning model for predicting ecchymosis after total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Risk factors for postoperative ecchymosis after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: an exploratory analysis of thromboelastography parameters.BMC surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a standard procedure for end-stage knee diseases, yet perioperative bleeding and its complications, such as ecchymosis, remain significant challenges. Predicting ecchymosis can guide personalized perioperative blood management, enhancing patient recovery and reducing the socioeconomic burden. In this prospective study (June 2023-March 2024), 416 TKA patients were split into ecchymosis (n = 135) and non-ecchymosis (n = 281) groups. The first seven months' data (312 patients) were used for training, and the next three months' (104 patients) for validation. Feature selection used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest-Recursive Feature Elimination (RF-RFE), and BORUTA to identify key risk factors. The model was tested with advanced machine learning: Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM). Major risk factors included low prealbumin, reduced coagulation index (CI) and its change (XCI), high fibrinogen degradation products (FDP), and postoperative day 1 total blood loss (TBL). The model showed robust performance with area under the curve values (AUCs) of 0.927 in training and 0.954 in validation set. The model's superior high performance offers significant guidance for early and accurate prediction, enabling personalized anticoagulation therapy and optimizing perioperative blood management in TKA patients.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR2400080173).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.