ArticleScientific reports2026
Study on the evolution law of failure depth of large mining height and ultra-wide working surface.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deviatoric stress evolution and time step control technology of retreat roadway surrounding rock in fully mechanized working face.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Classification analysis of coal wall failure modes and grey system theory-based evaluation methodology for influencing factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Discrete element study on mechanical properties of layered sand-cobble strata under unloading stress path of shield construction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The significance of structural coal in regional coal and gas outbursts in southern Sichuan Coalfield.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in coal mining technology and sophisticated equipment have popularized large-scale mining with broad working faces. This study uses the 6306 ultra-wide working face of Jincheng Sihe Coal Mine as a case to establish a mechanical model of the bottom plate through theoretical analysis, field measurements, and numerical simulations. These methods address water outburst issues caused by high and wide working faces. The research systematically examines changes in the coal seam floor's displacement and stress fields during mining. A double-end water leak measurement device and peephole were employed to assess floor damage extent. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to understand the dynamic evolution of destruction in large-scale mining with high and wide working faces, providing technical specifications for water control in constrained water and high-intensity coal mining environments. The results show that the maximum damage depth of the coal seam floor relates to peak advance support pressure and not just the coal wall's damage area. Field measurements using a drilling peep and leak detection equipment found the maximum damage depth of the test surface to be 19.63 m. Mining forces greatly impact the rock mass near the coal seam, increasing new floor cracks as the working face progresses. The measured maximum damage depth of 20.25 m aligns with theoretical values. Additionally, as the working face advances, a "stress arch" forms in the coal seam floor, significantly affecting the aquifer at its peak mining effect. After a certain distance, the pressure water guide becomes stable, and the bottom plate's vertical displacement increases, causing the pressure guide water belt's top interface to move upward and decrease pore water pressure. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and control of water damage on the bottom plate of adjacent mines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.