ArticleScientific data2026
An EEG Dataset for Visual Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dataset Fragmentation, Cognitive Variability, and Reproducibility Challenges in EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- A Deep Learning Framework for EEG-Based Decoding of Visually Imagined Arrows with Different Colors and Directions.Biosensors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the advancement of non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies, decoding high-level cognitive activity has become pivotal for expanding human-machine interaction. Visual imagery-based BCI (VI-BCI) enable voluntary activation of specific brain regions without external cue, offering novel pathways for immersive applications. However, research on the neural representation of such complex cognitive tasks is still limited, and most existing electroencephalogram (EEG) datasets primarily target motor imagery, hindering the development of robust VI decoding models. Here we present an EEG dataset recorded from 22 participants performing visual imagery tasks involving ten commonly recognized images across three categories: figures, animals, and objects. Each participant completed two sessions, with EEG recorded from 32-channels at 1000 Hz. This resource helps overcome data homogeneity issues in VI studies and provides a foundation for exploring neuroplasticity, adaptive decoding algorithms, and cross-subject generalization, facilitating the transition from controlled experiments to real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.