ArticleScientific data2026
Human Activity Recognition Dataset for Pedestrians with Mobility Disabilities.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technology-Enhanced Health Care in Smart Homes: Scoping Review of Sensor Technologies, Clinical Applications, Integration Challenges, and Future Directions.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Human Activity Recognition Dataset for Pedestrians with Mobility Disabilities.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human activity recognition (HAR) provided several benefits to people without disabilities. Researchers have provided public HAR datasets and developed technologies based on these datasets. However, the activities of pedestrians with mobility disabilities have not been actively investigated because related datasets do not exist. In this study, we compile an HAR dataset comprising basic activities for people with and without mobility disabilities (including activity categories of still, walking, crutches, walkers, manual wheelchairs, and electric wheelchairs). Our dataset contains sensor data from smart devices (smartphones and smartwatches) collected from 120 participants. We also provide baseline analyses of our dataset: (1) recognition tasks according to the pedestrian activities, (2) impact of sensor combinations, (3) classification models, (4) evaluation methods, and (5) combining smartphone and smartwatch sensors. The results indicate that the classification accuracies are 99.64% for the random evaluation and 98.79% for the user-independent evaluation using the best combinations. We hope that this study will expand HAR research for people with mobility disabilities and renew enthusiasm for subsequent applications related to this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.