Trial reportNature communications2026
Binimetinib and encorafenib for the treatment of advanced solid tumors with non-V600E BRAF mutations: results from the Phase II BEAVER trial.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03839342 (Binimetinib and Encorafenib for the Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors With Non-V600E BRAF Mutations), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Binimetinib and Encorafenib for the Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors With Non-V600E BRAF Mutations
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The GA4GH Categorical Variation Representation Specification: A Unified Computational Framework for Reasoning over Genomic Variant Categories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Class 2 and 3 non-V600E BRAF mutations are oncogenic drivers in many cancer types. Currently, there are no established targeted therapies with proven efficacy for cancers with non-V600E BRAF mutations. We developed the investigator-initiated, Phase II BEAVER clinical trial (NCT03839342) to evaluate the efficacy of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with non-V600E BRAF mutations. The primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR). The best ORR was 14% (3/21), the primary endpoint was not met. By analyzing genomic data from patient tumors, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models generated from enrolled patients, and Class 2 & 3 BRAF mutant cell lines, we discovered MAPK-dependent and independent mechanisms of resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibition. These mechanisms include the acquisition of new mutations in NRAS, MAP2K1, RAF1, and RB in ctDNA at the time of disease progression. CDK4/6 and SHP2 emerge as mediators of intrinsic resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibition in Class 2 & 3 BRAF mutant tumors. Therapeutic strategies combining CDK4/6 or SHP2 inhibitors with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in preclinical models show greater efficacy than BRAF/MEK inhibitors alone in these cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.