Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41483910›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical biology2026

Exploring techniques for extraction of silver fir (

Katja Schoss, Urša Pečar Fonović, Nina Kočevar Glavač

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katja SchossFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Urša Pečar FonovićFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nina Kočevar GlavačFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSilver fir (

objectiveTo compare extraction techniques and identify the optimal method for obtaining high-quality silver fir extracts with strong antioxidant activity and minimal cytotoxicity. MATERIALS &

methodsExtracts from bark and branches were prepared using subcritical water extraction (SWE, 70-200 °C), supercritical CO

resultsThe SWE bark extract at 100 °C (SWE-BA-100) showed the highest TPC (73.8 mg GAE/g), lignan content (secoisolariciresinol 204.7 µg/mL), and antioxidant activity (DPPH: 24.2, ABTS: 32.0 mg GAE/g). Bark extracts had superior bioactive profiles compared to branches, though branch extractions gave higher yields. All extracts were non-cytotoxic. SWE-BA-100 inhibited cell migration, indicating a complex interaction between composition and cellular response. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionSWE at 100 °C is a promising green method for producing potent antioxidant extracts from

Indexed as

AbiesAntioxidantsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsBiphenyl CompoundsCaco-2 CellsCell MovementCell SurvivalHaCaT CellsHumansLignansPlant BarkPolyphenolsAntioxidantsBiphenyl CompoundsLignansPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsPolyphenolsAntioxidant activitycytotoxicitypolyphenolssilver fir (Abies alba)subcritical water extraction

Identifiers

PMID41483910
PMCPMC12777867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.