ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
Addressing genetic discrimination and its stigmatizing effects through human rights.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Legal, ethical and moral dilemma of human cloning: the conflict between technological progress and human dignity.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic stigma and resulting discrimination are multifaceted concerns that impact people's willingness to undergo genetic testing, contributing to disproportionately adverse health outcomes for marginalized communities. While concerns of genetic discrimination (GD) manifest across multiple demographics, they are particularly prevalent amongst certain groups where previous experiences of discrimination can propagate complex stigmas. To address these concerns, countries worldwide have enacted genetic non-discrimination laws. However, while laws like Canada's Genetic Non-Discrimination Act have highlighted the need to prevent GD, they often treat instances of GD as isolated events, failing to account for the systemic inequities that lead to disparate rates of GD across particular communities. This paper argues that a human rights approach can better address how GD intersects with other forms of marginalization, providing a more holistic approach to combat the stigmatic effects of GD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.