ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2026
Is it feasible for surgical trainees to acquire JAG endoscopy accreditation by CCT? National online survey of UK trainees.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigher surgical trainees often struggle to attain endoscopy competencies. We aimed to obtain a national picture of higher surgical trainees' endoscopy experience, highlight barriers to training, and explore potential solutions.
methodsA 40-point electronic questionnaire was designed and disseminated to higher surgical trainees across the UK. Anonymous responses were collected and recorded from 26/10/2020 to 11/06/2021.
resultsA total of 139 higher surgical trainees from 16 out of the 19 regional UK deaneries responded. 75.9% (82/108) had some endoscopy training, and 19.4% (21/108) had no endoscopic training. 27.8% (30/108) had performed over 200 procedures. 77.8% (105/135) were not made aware of endoscopy training requirements by their Training Programme Directors (TPDs). 59.6% (65/109) had no named endoscopy supervisor. Only 49.1% (53/108) felt supported by their endoscopy trainers. Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy (JAG) certification was infrequent, and the highest levels, 14.4% (15/104), were achieved in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD). Only 55.8% (24/43) of JAG-certified trainees felt competent in that procedure. 50.0% (7/14) of ST8 (final year trainee) respondents were not JAG certified in any procedure. 90.6% (96/106) faced challenges in gaining endoscopy training. The most common obstacles were the COVID-19 pandemic 87.9% (94/107), on-call commitments 80.2% (85/106), lack of allocated endoscopy sessions 80.2% (85/106), insufficient endoscopy training lists 76.4% (81/106), and competition with non-surgical trainees 64.2% (68/106).
conclusionsOur survey provides detailed evidence of the challenges faced by surgical trainees in gaining endoscopy training. Suggested solutions include allocated endoscopy trainers, dedicated endoscopy-only training blocks, and early guidance about endoscopy training and certification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.