ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Venetoclax-based combination regimens for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) are an aggressive and heterogeneous group of myeloid disorders with no established guidelines for frontline treatment. This retrospective study of 53 consecutive t-MN patients at our institution evaluated the influence of clinical features, treatment approaches, and prognostic indicators on clinical outcomes of t-MN. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 61.0%, 50.0%, and 36.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 60 (p = 0.009), TP53 (p = 0.040) and RAS mutations (p = 0.018) were associated with inferior OS. After induction therapy, patients who received a venetoclax-based regimen (venetoclax group) had an overall response rate (ORR) of 96.2%, compared with 63.6% in the chemotherapy group (p = 0.007). The venetoclax group tended to have better OS and DFS than the chemotherapy group (p = 0.052 and p = 0.078). Importantly, ORR rates and OS were higher in some subgroups of the venetoclax group, especially in patients over 60 years old and patients with intermediate/adverse risk. This study demonstrates the feasibility of venetoclax-based combination regimens for the treatment of t-MN and may influence decision-making for frontline therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41483379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.