ArticleMemory & cognition2026
The dynamic competition between item distinctiveness and attentional boost effect.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE) refers to the enhancement in memory for background information that co-occurs with the detection of a target in a detection task. Previous research suggests that this effect is modulated by item distinctiveness, meaning that when background items have high distinctiveness (e.g., low-frequency words, negative items), the ABE is significantly reduced or even disappears. However, in previous studies, the detection stimulus and background items were synchronized in their onset times, which could lead to maximal overlap between the two enhancement effects. Accordingly, to further understand the relationship between item distinctiveness and target detection, we manipulated distinctive and nondistinctive memory items in three experiments and manipulated the onset time of detections stimuli. Distinctiveness was varied by manipulating the word frequency (Experiment 1), and the emotional valence of both words (Experiment 2) and images (Experiment 3). The detection stimulus was presented within two time windows: 0-100 ms or 400-500 ms during the presentation of background items. The results indicated that, compared with word frequency, negative valence exerted a more pronounced modulation of the ABE, and this modulation was not influenced by the onset time of detection stimulus. This finding further deepens our understanding of the interaction between item distinctiveness and the ABE, suggesting a complex competitive relationship between the two effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41483322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.