ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Development and Validation of a Tri-Language Questionnaire for Usability and Satisfaction of Mobile Health Applications (USHA) for Diabetes Mellitus Management.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A network toxicology and machine learning approach to uncover the molecular machinery of bisphenol A-induced colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing usability and satisfaction is vital to ensure the efficiency and optimal use of mobile health (mHealth) applications. Nevertheless, existing questionnaires revolve around computerized systems and lack validation for evaluating mHealth applications. We aimed to develop and validate a tri-language questionnaire to assess usability and satisfaction of mobile health applications (USHA). This study consisted of three phases: item development, translation, and validation. During the item development phase, a preliminary English version of the USHA questionnaire that comprised Likert-scale and demographic items was designed. Subsequently, forward-backward translation was performed to produce Malay and Chinese versions. Content validation was conducted with eight experts, followed by face validation with five diabetes mellitus patients. Reliability testing was conducted through test-retest analysis among diabetes mellitus patients. The initial tri-language USHA questionnaire consisted of 18 Likert-scale items and 8 demographic items. Following expert validation, five Likert-scale items and one demographic item were eliminated for lack of relevance, importance, or clarity, while four Likert-scale items were rephrased. During face validation, additional one demographic item was removed. The finalized questionnaire demonstrated high reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.845. Consequently, the tri-language USHA questionnaire consisted of 13 Likert-scale items and six demographic items, is a valid and reliable instrument that enhances accessibility and enables assessment of the usability and satisfaction of interactive mHealth applications, especially for diabetes mellitus care across a broad range of users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41483257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.