ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Factors associated with complication of cranioplasty: CT-based risk assessment for early failure of autologous-bone cranioplasty.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine whether preoperative noncontrast CT features predict early revision after autologous bone cranioplasty and to develop a simple CT-based risk framework. We retrospectively studied adults undergoing autologous cranioplasty at a single center (2010-2020). Preoperative CT variables and clinical indicators were evaluated as candidate predictors in the regression and machine-learning models. The primary outcome was unplanned revision surgery within 30 days. Associations were tested with multivariable logistic regression. A feature-importance derived from the random forest model was used to assess the relative contributions of risk factors. Among 376 patients (mean age 48.9 years; 71.0% male), 52 (13.8%) underwent revision surgery within postoperative 30 days. Encephalomalacia (EM) area was the dominant predictor (adjusted OR 4.311). A prespecified cut-off of ≥ 620 mm² yielded sensitivity 90.38% and specificity 59.88% (OR 14.03). Sinking skin flap (OR 6.17), hydrocephalus (OR 3.35), and EM involving ≥ 2 lobes (OR 4.37) were also significant. All patients (10/10) who underwent concurrent VP shunting during cranioplasty required revision surgery, resulting in a 100% failure rate for this group. A logistic regression achieved AUC 0.83 and accuracy 88.0% (specificity 97%, sensitivity 22%); random forest achieved AUC 0.85 and accuracy 88.2% (specificity 96%, sensitivity 33%). EM area ranked highest in feature importance. Preoperative CT provides independent prognostic information for early revision after autologous cranioplasty. A simple thresholded EM-area metric can serve as a high-sensitivity screening tool for predicting early failure after cranioplasty. When EM burden is substantial, the reconstructive strategy may warrant modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41483254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.