ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Construction and temporal external validation of interpretable machine-learning models for predicting tigecycline-associated hypofibrinogenemia.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThere is a paucity of available clinical tools with which to accurately predict the risk of tigecycline-associated hypofibrinogenemia, an adverse reaction with a high incidence and serious consequences. This study aimed to developed an optimal machine-learning model for predicting tigecycline-associated hypofibrinogenemia and to facilitate its clinical application.
methodsA total of 896 inpatients who received tigecycline treatment in a large tertiary teaching hospital between 2016 and 2022 were included in the model development cohort. Subsequent temporal external validation of the models was performed on 313 patients admitted in 2023. Three robust machine-learning algorithms, including LASSO, Boruta, and VSURF were integrated to identify predictors. These features were then utilized to construct nine machine-learning models. The optimal one was identified through model evaluation and validation and was interpreted based on the SHAP method.
resultsThe three algorithms identified five predictors, including age, treatment duration, pre-dose fibrinogen level, D-dimer level, and activated partial thromboplastin time. The XGboost model was identified as the most suitable due to its stability and excellent discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model were 0.823 (0.794-0.853), 0.810 (0.746-0.873), and 0.773 (0.721-0.825) in the training, internal validation, and temporal external validation cohorts, respectively.
conclusionsMachine-learning models are promising in solving the classification prediction problem of tigecycline-associated hypofibrinogenemia. Model interpretation based on SHAP enables clinicians to visualize individualized risk and tailor prophylactic strategies, potentially improving patient safety and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41483207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.