ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2026
Anatomy-guided computational framework for classifying vascular ligation and lymphadenectomy in oncologic sigmoidectomy: toward AI-supported surgical auditing.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07528937 (Randomized Multicenter Study Protocol), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Multicenter Study Protocol: Application of 3D Reconstruction for Preoperative Strategy of Locally Advanced Colon Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe optimal vascular ligation strategy and lymphadenectomy level in oncological sigmoidectomy remain controversial, with inconsistent definitions and a lack of standardized postoperative assessment. This study aimed to anatomically and radiologically define D2 and D3 lymphadenectomy in sigmoid colon cancer and to develop an objective multimodal protocol for postoperative classification of vascular ligation and recurrence patterns.
methodsA three-phase multimodal anatomical study was conducted. Phase 1 involved cadaveric dissections simulating D2 lymphadenectomy and D3 dissection with either low or high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). Phase 2 retrospectively assessed 14 patients with pre- and postoperative contrast-enhanced CT scans to classify vascular ligation type and recurrence pattern. Phase 3 validated these findings through AI-assisted computational segmentation and 3D reconstruction.
resultsIn cadaveric simulation, each vascular strategy (D2, D3-low tie, D3-high tie) was anatomically characterized in terms of arterial division point, venous drainage control, and residual mesocolon, allowing systematic differentiation of the three approaches. Radiological evaluation successfully identified the level of vascular ligation in all cases. Among patients with recurrence (n = 5), the classification protocol distinguished mesenteric from non-mesenteric recurrences based on vascular territory. The 3D reconstruction phase showed full concordance between the radiological classification and the 3D model regarding both the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation and the anatomical localization of locoregional recurrence.
conclusionThis standardized anatomical-radiological workflow, integrating cadaveric dissection, CT-based vascular analysis, and AI-assisted 3D reconstruction, provides an objective tool to classify the level of vascular ligation performed in oncological sigmoidectomy and to anatomically categorize locoregional recurrence, establishing a foundation for future surgical audit and outcome studies, and representing a step toward AI-supported surgical audit systems capable of standardizing vascular ligation classification and recurrence mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.