Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41483103›Full record

ReviewAging clinical and experimental research2026

The role of pharmacists in geriatric care: current evidence and practice.

Klejda Harasani, Sofia Duque, Karolina Piotrowicz, Marta Lavrador, Isabel Vitória Figueiredo, M Margarida Castel-Branco, Juarda Gjonbrataj, Marina Kotsani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Klejda HarasaniDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, Tirana, Albania. klejda.harasani@umed.edu.al.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-6662
Sofia DuquePreventive Medicine and Public Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Karolina PiotrowiczDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Marta LavradorDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Health Technologies, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Isabel Vitória FigueiredoPharmacology and Pharmaceutical Care Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
M Margarida Castel-BrancoPharmacology and Pharmaceutical Care Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Juarda GjonbratajDepartment of Internal Medicine, Salus Hospital, Tirana, Albania.
Marina KotsaniHellenic Society for the Study and Research of Ageing, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPharmacists are among the most available and frequently consulted healthcare providers supporting older adults. They can actively contribute to thorough geriatric assessments and interventions and are often included in geriatric teams across different care settings.

aimThis narrative review aims to compile current knowledge and practical approaches related to pharmacists' roles in caring for older adults.

methodsWe searched in three databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Included studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, published between the years 2014 and 2024 in any language, reporting on the involvement of pharmacists in geriatric care, their interventions and results.

resultsFrom 306 identified different records, 32 studies were included in the final synthesis. The majority (22; 68.8%) were systematic reviews, ten were RCTs. The studies reported on the role of pharmacists in geriatric care in diverse settings including home, community, outpatient clinics, hospital, long-term care and residential facilities. While interventions were often multifaceted and complex, they more commonly comprised medication reviews and medication reconciliation. Positive outcomes resulting from pharmacists´ interventions were reported in 71.9% of the studies, mostly focused on medication appropriateness, deprescribing, medication safety and effectiveness.

conclusionOur narrative review highlights the growing evidence supporting the integration of pharmacists into geriatric care teams across diverse clinical settings. Despite heterogeneity among studies and limited high-certainty evidence, the findings underscore the potential of pharmacists to contribute meaningfully to person-centred, multidisciplinary care in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

GeriatricsPharmacistsProfessional RoleAgedAged, 80 and overHumansGeriatric careNarrative reviewOlder adultsPharmacists

Identifiers

PMID41483103
PMCPMC12775093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.