Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41483089›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2026

A review of the portrayal of the medical doctor stereotype on television in english speaking countries (1954-present).

Cathal Flood, Emily O'Dowd, Eva Doherty, Barry B McGuire, Fardod O'Kelly

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cathal FloodRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. cathalotuile@rcsi.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4039-713X
Emily O'DowdRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-5459
Eva DohertyRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3774-5685
Barry B McGuireRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-1532
Fardod O'KellyRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-7689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelevision (TV) has long influenced societal perceptions of professional roles, including those in medicine. Given the increasing emphasis on diversity and inclusion (D&I) across healthcare, this study investigates whether these evolving societal values are reflected in the portrayal of medical doctors on TV.

aimsTo assess trends in the depiction of doctors in English-speaking medical TV dramas (1950s–2020s), focusing on diversity across gender, race, and LGBTQ + representation, and to examine whether key social and professional issues are portrayed over time.

methodsA content analysis was conducted of 82 English-language medical TV dramas featuring physicians as central characters, spanning 1951–2020. Data were extracted from online databases and verified by researcher review. Demographic and thematic characteristics of main, core, and recurring physician characters were coded and analysed descriptively, with categorical comparisons via chi-squared testing.

results618 seasons across 82 series were analysed. Main characters (MCs) were predominantly caucasian (95%) and heterosexual (100%), with female MC representation increasing to 50% in the 2010s. Core and recurring characters demonstrated greater racial and sexual diversity. Key themes such as mental illness, drug dependence, and burnout became more prevalent over time. A progressive pattern of “peripheral-to-central” diversification was noted, whereby diversity first emerged in supporting roles before appearing in main characters.

conclusionsWhile the portrayal of doctors on TV has diversified, significant gaps remain, especially regarding ethnic minority and LGBTQ + main characters. Continued evolution in representation could foster broader public identification and challenge outdated stereotypes in medicine.

Indexed as

PhysiciansStereotypingTelevisionFemaleHumansMaleDiversityMediaSocial mediaStereotypeTelevision

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.