Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41483077›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2026

When it's not RA: unmasking Whipple's disease in seronegative, difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis.

Rahaf Zyad Attar, Raymond Chu, Susan Humphrey-Murto, Sarah Mansour, John Woulfe, Sibel Zehra Aydin

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rahaf Zyad AttarDivision of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Rahaf_attar@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1165-1173
Raymond ChuDivision of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Susan Humphrey-MurtoDivision of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Sarah MansourDivision of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
John WoulfeDivision of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Sibel Zehra AydinDivision of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhipple's disease (WD) is a rare systemic infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei, often misdiagnosed as seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) due to overlapping clinical features. Delayed diagnosis may lead to multisystem complications, particularly in patients treated with immunosuppressive or biologic therapies. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe two cases of WD initially misdiagnosed as refractory seronegative rheumatoid arthritis. Both patients were middle-aged men with persistently elevated inflammatory markers and poor responses to multiple biologic treatments. One developed constrictive pericarditis-the first reported to be successfully treated with anakinra-while the other presented with immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)-related myositis, representing the first reported IRIS myositis in WD. REVIEW

findingsA literature review of 215 cases of WD misdiagnosed as RA or RA-like arthritis (including the two current cases) revealed that 77% were male, and most were seronegative. Among 139 patients with serologic data, 13.6% were RF-positive; of 132 with ACPA results, only 3.7% were positive. Erosive disease was reported in 33%. The median diagnostic delay was 7 years (range: 3-35 years). Gastrointestinal and constitutional symptoms were the most frequent triggers for reevaluation. Non-invasive PCR testing (saliva, stool) has emerged as a sensitive and practical diagnostic approach, particularly in localized or rheumatology-predominant presentations.

conclusionWD remains underrecognized in rheumatology practice. Early consideration in patients with refractory seronegative arthritis-especially middle-aged men with persistent inflammation-may prevent unnecessary immunosuppression and life-threatening complications. Based on accumulated evidence, we propose a pragmatic, tiered diagnostic algorithm to guide screening and confirmation of WD in rheumatologic settings, emphasizing the integration of noninvasive PCR-based testing to improve diagnostic yield and reduce delays. Key Points • Whipple's disease should be considered in inflammatory arthritis that is refractory to treatment and often seronegative with elevated CRP despite multiple immunosuppressive therapies. • Structured screening strategies may be warranted in rheumatology settings for patients meeting "high-risk criteria". Further studies are needed to assess the utility and cost-effectiveness of such approaches. • Saliva and stool PCR testing demonstrate high negative predictive value in the literature and are proposed as suitable non-invasive tools for initial screening. • Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) is a potentially serious complication following antimicrobial therapy for Whipple's disease, especially in patients previously treated with immunosuppressive agents. Early recognition is critical for appropriate management.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidWhipple DiseaseAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTropherymaArthritisPolyarthritisRheumatoid/diagnosisTreatment failureWhipple disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.