ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Volumetric predictors of recurrence in chronic subdural hematomas: surgical technique comparison and 3D slicer-assisted volumetric analysis.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the clinical applicability of 3D Slicer-assisted volume calculations through the analysis of results from single/burr-hole craniostomy (sBHC/dBHC), and mini-craniotomy procedures for the management of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). A total of 163 patients with cSDH between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2024, were admitted to our department. sBHC, dBHC or mini-craniotomy procedures were performed. Baseline characteristics, radiological features, and surgical and postoperative parameters were evaluated for all three procedures. Volumetric calculations were performed by employing 3D Slicer. Mini-craniotomy was performed in 67 patients (41.1%), sBHC in 54 (33.1%), and dBHC in 42 (25.8%). The overall recurrence rate was 20.9%, being lowest after mini-craniotomy (10.4%), followed by dBHC (19%) and sBHC (35.2%) (p = 0.004). Although mini-craniotomy achieved superior evacuation efficiency, surgical technique was not independently associated with recurrence after accounting for volumetric factors. In the primary model, each 10 mL increase in residual hematoma volume (RHV) increased the odds of recurrence ≈ 35-fold (p < 0.001). Both RHV and hematoma evacuation rate (HER) independently predicted recurrence, showing excellent discrimination (Area under the curve [AUC] = 0.965 and 0.961). Optimal cutoffs were ≈ 19 mL for RHV and 68% for HER, confirmed by cross-validation and sensitivity analyses. RHV and HER independently predicted recurrence, whereas surgical technique lost significance after accounting for these volumetric factors. Thresholds of ≈ 19 mL (RHV) and 68% (HER) may guide postoperative monitoring. 3D Slicer provides a simple, accessible tool for recurrence prediction in cSDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41483056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.