ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Morphological risk factors of parent arteries in intracranial aneurysm formation: an interpretable machine learning analysis.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIntracranial aneurysms (IAs) pose a severe threat to human health. While the morphological features of the parent artery exert a significant influence on their development, the specific mechanisms of influence and contribution remain unclear. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, this study constructed a risk assessment model for IAs.
methodsSeventy-nine patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms (experimental group) and 79 healthy individuals (control group) were enrolled. First, five types of indicators—including diameter, angle, tortuosity index, taper, and stenosis degree—were measured. Next, an automated machine learning (AutoML)-based classification model was built to predict the risk of IA occurrence, while SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to evaluate the contribution of each feature. Finally, model performance was assessed using metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).
resultsBifurcation angle is key to IA formation. The optimal risk prediction model, an ensemble of ridge regression, linear discriminant analysis, and linear support vector machine, shows strong performance (accuracy: 0.856, AUC: 0.967). Additionally, feature contribution ranking highlights greater contributions from bifurcation angle, bifurcation diameter ratio, smaller daughter vessel taper, and smaller daughter vessel stenosis.
conclusionParent artery morphological characteristics are key to IA formation, with five types—diameter, angle, tortuosity index, taper, and stenosis degree—playing significant roles. The AutoML-built ensemble machine learning model performed well in predicting aneurysm occurrence and contribute to assisting clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41483016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.