ArticleNoise & health
Effectiveness of Dynamic Noise Monitoring Combined with Staged Nursing Care on Nocturnal Motor Symptoms in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe effectiveness of dynamic noise monitoring combined with staged nursing care on nocturnal motor symptoms was evaluated in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).
methodsThis retrospective clinical study enrolled 200 patients with PD, who were hospitalised from March 2021 to December 2024. The patients were divided into the following two groups based on the nursing methods they received: dynamic noise monitoring group (n = 102), which underwent dynamic noise monitoring and received staged nursing care, or the staged nursing care group (n = 98), which received staged nursing care alone. The primary outcomes comprised the nighttime scores of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2). The assessed secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR), blood pressure, salivary cortisol levels, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18). We used independent samples t-tests for intergroup comparisons, paired t-tests for intragroup comparisons and χ2 tests for categorical variables.
resultsThe dynamic noise monitoring group exhibited markedly lower noise levels and reduced noise exposure events exceeding 50 and 60 dBA in comparison to the staged nursing care group (P < 0.001). Compared with the staged nursing care group, the dynamic noise monitoring group exhibited markedly reduced UPDRS-III nighttime scores and PDSS-2 ratings (P < 0.001). Moreover, notable enhancements were noted in HR, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and salivary cortisol levels. The PDQ-39 Summary Index scores and PSQ-18 total satisfaction scores demonstrated significant enhancements in the dynamic noise monitoring group (all P < 0.05).
conclusionDynamic noise monitoring, when integrated into staged nursing care, considerably enhances nocturnal motor symptoms, sleep quality and overall well-being in patients with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.