Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41482893›Full record

ArticleNoise & health

Circadian Disruption from Urban Night-Time Noise and Endocrine Health Risks in Shift Workers.

Daniel Onut Badea

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel Onut BadeaPersonal Protective Equipment Laboratory, National Research and Development Institute of Occupational Safety - I.N.C.D.P.M. "Alexandru Darabont", Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis review examines how nighttime noise and irregular schedules influence circadian and endocrine regulation. It introduces a conceptual multilevel model to explore how these exposures may accumulate over time and contribute to long-term health risks.

methodsA scoping narrative review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses principles in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase (1992-2024), including human studies on nighttime noise and shift work. Eligible studies involved adults and reported circadian, hormonal, metabolic or chronic disease outcomes. Twenty-five studies were synthesised using direction-based vote counting due to heterogeneity because meta-analysis was not feasible. The tally reflected the direction of effects rather than statistical significance. Risk-of-bias assessments informed interpretation, but not exclusion. Findings were integrated into a multilevel model integrating exposure, physiological mediation and cumulative effects.

resultsNighttime noise and rotating night duties shifted melatonin timing and reduced sleep continuity. Studies reported increased fasting glucose, decreased insulin sensitivity and unfavourable lipid profiles in groups exposed to these work periods. Several investigations described an increase in cardiometabolic load amongst long-term night-duty workers. In the simulation scenarios, the model followed these findings and produced circadian and metabolic changes that increased across repeated exposure cycles.

conclusionsThis review proposes and illustrates a dynamic framework for understanding how nighttime noise and shift work may contribute to circadian and metabolic disruption over time. Its exploratory nature reflects heterogeneous evidence and a scoping design. The findings should be interpreted without causal inference.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmNoise, OccupationalShift Work ScheduleSleep Disorders, Circadian RhythmWork Schedule ToleranceHumansMelatoninMelatonincircadian rhythmoccupational healthrisk assessmentshift work schedule

Identifiers

PMID41482893
PMCPMC12818512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.