Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41482571›Full record

ReviewNature materials2026

Artificial intelligence-driven approaches for materials design and discovery.

Mouyang Cheng, Chu-Liang Fu, Ryotaro Okabe, Abhijatmedhi Chotrattanapituk, Artittaya Boonkird, Nguyen Tuan Hung, Mingda Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. An exciting Approach to Theoretical Spectroscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  14. Green and Low-Carbon Synthesis of Lithium Sulfide (LiAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. CCVAN Leverages Conditional Molecular Generation Through Conditional VAE and Wasserstein GAN.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mouyang Cheng *Quantum Measurement Group, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. vipandyc@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7014-2464
Chu-Liang Fu *Quantum Measurement Group, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-9622
Ryotaro Okabe *Quantum Measurement Group, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5095-5951
Abhijatmedhi Chotrattanapituk *Quantum Measurement Group, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6278-1138
Artittaya BoonkirdQuantum Measurement Group, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nguyen Tuan HungFrontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-6230
Mingda LiQuantum Measurement Group, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. mingda@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7055-6368

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) ITE-2345084U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0021940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials design is an important component of modern science and technology, yet traditional approaches rely heavily on trial and error and can be inefficient. Computational techniques, enhanced by modern artificial intelligence, have reshaped the landscape of designing new materials. Among these approaches, inverse design has shown great promise in designing materials that meet specific property requirements. In this Review, we present key computational advances in materials design over the past few decades. We follow the evolution of relevant materials design techniques, from high-throughput forward machine learning methods and evolutionary algorithms, to advanced artificial intelligence strategies such as reinforcement learning and deep generative models. We highlight the paradigm shift from conventional screening approaches to inverse generation driven by deep generative models. Finally, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives of materials inverse design. This Review may serve as a brief guide to the approaches, progress and outlook of designing future functional materials with technological relevance.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.