Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41482404›Full record

ReviewIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Granulocytes and their Involvement in the Foreign Body Response to Biomaterials and Tissue Repair.

Mike Barbeck, Ole Jung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mike BarbeckClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany mike.barbeck@med.uni-rostock.de.
Ole JungClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Granulocytes, long considered short-lived effector cells, are increasingly recognized as key modulators of the foreign body response (FBR) to biomaterials and determinants of regenerative outcomes. This review summarizes current evidence on the roles of neutrophils, basophils, and eosinophils in biomaterial-associated inflammation and tissue remodeling. Particular focus is placed on protein adsorption, cytokine release, and downstream effects across diverse biomaterial classes, including bone substitutes, collagen scaffolds, titanium, magnesium, and synthetic polymers. Neutrophils dominate the acute phase through reactive oxygen species, proteases, and neutrophil extracellular traps, which can either support remodeling or drive fibrosis and implant failure. Basophils, though rare, release histamine and Th2 cytokines, enhancing angiogenesis but also contributing to fibrotic encapsulation. Eosinophils are recruited in material-dependent patterns, releasing cytotoxic granules and pro-regenerative mediators, thereby functioning as double-edged regulators of degradation, fibrosis, and vascularization. Overall, granulocytes act as critical, though often overlooked, determinants of biomaterial integration. Incorporating granulocyte biology into biomaterial design-through modulation of surface chemistry, protein adsorption, and degradation kinetics- offers a promising path to guide inflammatory cascades toward constructive remodeling, angiogenesis, and predictable clinical performance.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsForeign-Body ReactionGranulocytesAnimalsCytokinesHumansInflammationBiocompatible MaterialsCytokinesbiomaterialsforeign body responseGranulocytesimmunomodulationreviewtissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID41482404
PMCPMC12764263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.