Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41482384›Full record

Observational studyIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Use of Fluorescent Catheters to Prevent Urological Organ Injury in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

Ken Imaizumi, Nobuki Ichikawa, Yudai Yagihashi, Tadashi Yoshida, Yosuke Ohno, Kengo Shibata, Chihiro Ishizuka, Shunji Sano, Akinobu Taketomi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ken ImaizumiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Nobuki IchikawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan n_ichi@pop.med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Yudai YagihashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Tadashi YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yosuke OhnoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kengo ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Chihiro IshizukaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shunji SanoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Akinobu TaketomiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimIn minimally invasive colorectal surgery, ureteral and urethral injuries are uncommon, but they can have serious complications leading to significant postoperative morbidity. Fluorescent catheters have recently been introduced to improve the intraoperative visibility of urological organs. However, clinical reports on their use remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of fluorescent ureteral and urethral catheters to prevent urological injuries during laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excision colorectal surgeries. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective observational study included 13 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery with fluorescent catheter placement at the Hokkaido University Hospital between September 2023 and January 2025. The catheters were visualized using various near-infrared ray imaging systems. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of intraoperative ureteral or urethral injuries; the secondary endpoint was intraoperative visibility of the ureter/urethra.

resultsNine patients received ureteral catheter, two received urethral catheter, and two received both ureteral and urethral catheters for pelvic exenteration. All ureters were clearly identified intraoperatively and no ureteral injuries occurred. In the two urethral catheter cases performed for urethral preservation, the catheter was not directly visible from the surgical field during transanal total mesorectal excision, suggesting a lack of proximity, and urethral preservation was achieved. In the two pelvic exenteration cases, both the ureters and urethral were visualized and intentionally resected without inadvertent injury.

conclusionFluorescent catheterization is a feasible, safe, and practical technique for enhancing intraoperative identification of urological structures in high-risk colorectal surgery. Its use may help reduce the risk of inadvertent injury, particularly in anatomically complex and minimally invasive procedures.

Indexed as

CathetersColorectal SurgeryMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterUrethraUrinary CathetersFluorescent catheterminimally invasive surgeryureteral injuryurethral injury

Identifiers

PMID41482384
PMCPMC12764205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.