ArticleBrain research2026
Transient effects in corticospinal and reticulospinal tract excitability induced by motor skill and isometric resistance training.
Article in Brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coordinated movement relies on the proper integration of multiple neural circuits. Motor training can alter the excitability of neural circuits controlling movement, but the pathway-specific effects to the lower limb of motor skill versus isometric resistance training remain unclear. Here, we tested how single 30-minute sessions of cue-paced motor skill and isometric resistance training modulate corticospinal, reticulospinal, and spinal excitability in unimpaired adults (N = 23). Using motor-evoked potentials via transcranial magnetic stimulation, we found motor skill training increased corticospinal excitability, while isometric resistance training did not. In contrast, by assessing reticulospinal tract excitability by StartReact responses and measuring spinal excitability with H/M ratios, F-wave response amplitude, and persistence, we found that each tract's excitability remained largely unchanged. These results suggest that short-term motor skill training selectively enhances corticospinal tract excitability without a measurable impact on spinal or reticulospinal circuits. These results highlight the influence of task complexity on distal lower limb excitability and provide a framework for evaluating neural adaptations across corticospinal, reticulospinal, and spinal circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.