Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41482176›Full record

ArticleBrain research2026

Transient effects in corticospinal and reticulospinal tract excitability induced by motor skill and isometric resistance training.

Rachel Hawthorn, Natalie Phelps, Carolyn Atkinson, Rodolfo Keesey, Zachary Seitz, Haolin Nie, Ismael Seáñez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel HawthornBiomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States; Division of Neurotechnology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, United States.
Natalie PhelpsBiomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States; Division of Neurotechnology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, United States.
Carolyn AtkinsonBiomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States; Division of Neurotechnology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, United States.
Rodolfo KeeseyBiomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States; Division of Neurotechnology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, United States.
Zachary SeitzBiomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States.
Haolin NieBiomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States.
Ismael SeáñezBiomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States; Division of Neurotechnology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, United States; Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, United States. Electronic address: ismaelseanez@wustl.edu.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Engineering Career Development Center in Movement and Rehabilitation SciencesK12HD073945 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DEWALD, JULIUS P, REINKENSMEYER, DAVID JAY · 2012 to 2021
$7.9M
Neural plasticity by spinal cord stimulation and training in people with spinal cord injuryK01NS127936 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ismael Seanez · 2022 to 2026
$1.0M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD073945NINDS NIH HHS K01 NS127936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated movement relies on the proper integration of multiple neural circuits. Motor training can alter the excitability of neural circuits controlling movement, but the pathway-specific effects to the lower limb of motor skill versus isometric resistance training remain unclear. Here, we tested how single 30-minute sessions of cue-paced motor skill and isometric resistance training modulate corticospinal, reticulospinal, and spinal excitability in unimpaired adults (N = 23). Using motor-evoked potentials via transcranial magnetic stimulation, we found motor skill training increased corticospinal excitability, while isometric resistance training did not. In contrast, by assessing reticulospinal tract excitability by StartReact responses and measuring spinal excitability with H/M ratios, F-wave response amplitude, and persistence, we found that each tract's excitability remained largely unchanged. These results suggest that short-term motor skill training selectively enhances corticospinal tract excitability without a measurable impact on spinal or reticulospinal circuits. These results highlight the influence of task complexity on distal lower limb excitability and provide a framework for evaluating neural adaptations across corticospinal, reticulospinal, and spinal circuits.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsPyramidal TractsResistance TrainingAdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalSpinal CordTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultActivity-based trainingAlpha motor neuronsCorticospinal tractNeural excitabilityReticulospinal tractStartReactTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41482176
PMCPMC12930521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.