ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Striving and thriving: Gender differences in the effects of climbing the socioeconomic ladder on stress and discrimination.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent evidence suggests upward socioeconomic mobility ("striving") may result in worse physical health. It has been hypothesized that striving might result in greater stress and discrimination, but prior observational evidence of this has been mixed.
methodsWe analyzed data from The RISE UP study, a natural experimental study of 1270 low-income students in Los Angeles who were offered entrance to high-performing charter high schools via a random lottery. We compared lottery winners to those waitlisted, enabling objective assessment of striving with less confounding and selection bias. Self-reported stress using the Adolescent Stress Questionnaire and the Perceived Stress Scale and an abbreviated Everyday DiscriminationScale measuring lifetime discrimination were collected prospectively from adolescence into early adulthood.
resultsDuring adolescence, perceived psychologic stress was greater among lottery winners than among the waitlist group but only among the females with little difference among males. During early adulthood, females exposed to high performing schools continued to report greater stress compared to waitlisted females. In contrast, among males, lottery winners reported lower stress compared to waitlisted subjects during this age period. No differences in perceived discrimination were observed between lottery winners and waitlisted students regardless of gender.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that the process of upward mobility may incur psychological costs, particularly for females. The study highlights the need for further inquiry into mechanisms underlying gender disparities in the health effects of striving, and underscores the complex interplay between socioeconomic mobility, stress, discrimination, and health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.