ArticleACS chemical biology2026
Quantitative Degradation Rate Assessment of bioPROTACs Based on Peptide Degrons, E3 Domains, Adapters and Conjugated Small Molecules.
Article in ACS chemical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reductive Methylation: An Alternative to Lysine → Arginine Mutagenesis.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-based bispecific degraders, known as bioPROTACs, have emerged as powerful tools for targeted protein degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). However, the relative efficacy of various recruitment domains within these degraders remains poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a comprehensive comparison of recruitment domains in bioPROTACs, utilizing eGFP as a proof-of-principle degradation target and an eGFP-binding DARPin with known structure as an adapter. Our innovative approach combined microinjection and live-cell microscopy, enabling a detailed assessment of directly measured degradation rates as a single-cell kinetic readout, unaffected by uptake or biosynthesis rates of the degrader, and across the different chemical classes. We examined nine degron peptides, three E3 ligase domains or adapters, and two series of small-molecule binders, linked in various geometries. Our results revealed that bioPROTACs based on E3 or adapter protein domains and small molecules generally exhibited the highest degradation rates, while most degron peptides showed comparatively low efficacy. Notably, for VHL-ligand-1 and thalidomide, the placement of the coupling site and linker position significantly influenced performance. This study provides crucial insights into the design and optimization of bioPROTACs, paving the way for the development of more effective degraders for specific applications. Our findings contribute to the growing field of targeted protein degradation and offer valuable guidance for researchers seeking to enhance the efficacy of bioPROTAC-based therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.