Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481821›Full record

ReviewClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2026

Maximizing Neurovascular Outcomes of Facial Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review.

Olivia A James, Faye Bennett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivia A JamesThe University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0508-2438
Faye BennettClinical Anatomy Department, The University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial transplantation is a division of reconstructive surgery which aims to improve the function and appearance of a face that has endured severe disfigurement. Currently, the face transplant procedure uses allogenic tissue, harvested from a brain-dead donor, to replace damaged facial components. To date, 50 face transplants have been performed worldwide. Survival and functional success of the transplant is dependent on multiple factors; however, effective neurovascular recovery of the graft is arguably the most important. An effective vasculature system is essential to avoid necrosis and death of the transplanted tissue, and an effective nervous system is required for the graft to regain function. This comprehensive review examines and evaluates recommendations found in different studies to try and determine techniques for achieving optimal neurovascular graft outcomes. Sensory recovery of the graft occurs spontaneously through natural regeneration of the trigeminal nerve's cutaneous branches. Motor recovery, however, relies on precise coaptation of donor and recipient nerves using microsurgical sutures, reinforced by fibrin glue. Additional considerations, including parotid gland exclusion and use of a nerve graft, can further improve outcomes. Pre-operative vascular assessment of both the donor and recipient is another crucial consideration. Computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography can be used to plan and enable successful end-to-end or end-to-side anastomosis of vessels. If applied in future facial transplantation procedures, these techniques could enhance recovery, improve functional outcomes, and lead to a greater patient quality of life.

Indexed as

FaceFacial TransplantationTrigeminal NerveHumansRecipient VesselsAllograftFace transplantFacial transplantationNeurovascularPlastic surgeryReconstructive surgery

Identifiers

PMID41481821
PMCPMC13648298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.