ArticlePloS one2026
Software for dataset-wide XAI: From local explanations to global insights with Zennit, CoRelAy, and ViRelAy.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-based discovery of functional boundaries in the human brain from intraoperative electrophysiology.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A Hybrid Explainable AI Framework (HXAI) for Accurate and Interpretable Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the clinical value of concept-based AI explanations in gastrointestinal disease detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- TF-LIME : Interpretation Method for Time-Series Models Based on Time-Frequency Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Benchmarking explanation methods for mental state decoding with deep learning models.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Deep learning interpretability in neuroimaging: A comprehensive survey and methodological recommendations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
- Bias and generalizability of brain age prediction models: A multi-cohort evaluation with anatomical and interpretability insights.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The predictive capabilities of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are well-established, yet the underlying mechanisms driving these predictions often remain opaque. The advent of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has introduced novel methodologies to explore the reasoning behind complex model predictions of complex models. Among post-hoc attribution methods, Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) has demonstrated notable adaptability and performance for explaining individual predictions - provided the method is used to its full potential. For deeper dataset-wide and quantitative analyses, however, the manual inspection of individual attribution maps remains unnecessarily labor-intensive and time consuming. While several approaches for dataset-wide XAI-analyses have been proposed, unified and accessible implementations of such tools are still lacking. Furthermore, there is a notable absence of dedicated visualization and analysis software to support stakeholders in interpreting both local and global XAI results effectively. This gap underscores the need for comprehensive software tools that facilitate both granular and holistic understanding of model behavior, as well as easing the adaptability of XAI in applications and the sciences. To address these challenges, we present three software packages designed to facilitate the exploration of model reasoning using attribution approaches and beyond: (1) Zennit - a highly customizable and intuitive attribution framework implementing LRP and related methods in PyTorch, (2) CoRelAy - a framework to easily and quickly construct quantitative analysis pipelines for dataset-wide analyses of explanations, and (3) ViRelAy - an interactive web-application for exploring data, attributions, and analysis results. By providing a standardized implementation for XAI, we aim to promote reproducibility in our field and empower scientists and practitioners to uncover the intricacies of complex model behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.