Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481754›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A two-phase core-plasma model for microvascular blood flow: Comparative analysis of hemodynamic models.

Maya Salame, Marianne Fenech

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maya SalameDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-5213
Marianne FenechDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0958-671X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microcirculatory blood flow exhibits complex non-Newtonian behavior, including shear-thinning properties and the formation of a cell-free layer (CFL)-a plasma-rich region near vessel walls. While traditional rheological models such as Newtonian, Power Law, and Carreau describe certain flow characteristics, and empirical models like the double-parameter power fit have been used to capture velocity profiles, these approaches fall short in fully characterizing the dynamic interplay between red blood cells (RBCs) and plasma. This study introduces the Core-Plasma Model, a two-phase framework that integrates Newtonian and non-Newtonian elements to represent the RBC-rich core and surrounding CFL. In vitro experiments in 25 [Formula: see text]m and 50 [Formula: see text]m round channels across varying flow rates, hematocrit levels (5-20%), and suspending media (PBS and native plasma) demonstrate the model's superior ability to capture velocity and shear rate profiles. The Core-Plasma Model offers a robust platform for advancing microscale hemodynamic predictions and deepening the understanding of microvascular flow dynamics.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsMicrocirculationMicrovesselsModels, CardiovascularPlasmaBlood Flow VelocityErythrocytesHematocritHumans

Identifiers

PMID41481754
PMCPMC12758828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.