ArticleScience advances2026
A behavioral integration mechanism underlies action timing.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animals often display stereotyped behavioral patterns during timekeeping tasks. However, it remains unclear whether these behaviors are simply incidental-used by the animals to kill time-or whether they serve a functional role as part of the internal clock that enables animals to keep time. Here, using optogenetic stimulation of various brainstem, thalamic, and dopaminergic cell populations in mice trained on an action-timing task, we manipulated actions preceding the timing decision to causally test these hypotheses. Our findings show that bidirectional regulation of actions during the waiting period leads to corresponding temporal shifts in timing, with a consistent quantitative relationship between changes in the number of waiting-period actions and shifts in stop timing. Notably, nigrostriatal dopamine encodes actions, but not timing, directly, influencing timing only when waiting-period actions are modulated. These findings reveal a behavioral integration mechanism underlying action timing, in which actions performed during the waiting period function as a pacemaker for the internal clock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.