ArticlePloS one2026
Translation, adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Abortion Attitude Scale - A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study among medical students.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnintentionally pregnant individuals in Germany seeking an abortion face challenges due to legal regulations, stigma and difficult access to abortion care. Abortion attitudes of (prospective) physicians influence the care situation. To measure these attitudes, psychometrically sound instruments like the Abortion Attitude Scale (AAS) are necessary. So far, no instruments assessing attitudes toward abortions are available in German. This study aims to translate, culturally adapt and psychometrically test the AAS.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study on abortion attitudes of medical students in Germany. The English 14-item AAS was translated into German and adapted using a team translation protocol. Comprehensibility was tested via cognitive interviews (n = 10 medical students). We analyzed acceptance (completion rate), factor structure (confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), model fit), item characteristics (response distribution, item difficulties, corrected item-total correlations, inter-item correlations), and reliability (McDonald's omega).
resultsThe translated and adapted AAS version was comprehensible. AAS data of 305 medical students could be included in analysis. Completion rate was above 98% for all items. The CFA results confirmed a one-factor structure, but a model without item 10 and correlations between item 8 and item 13 showed the best model fits. Floor or ceiling effects could be found for 7 items, item difficulties ranged between 0.39 and 0.94, corrected item-total correlations ranged between 0.460 and 0.766 for the best model, inter-item correlations ranged between.129 to.681, and McDonald's omega was above 0.9 for both models.
conclusionThe German AAS is a brief measure that was accepted and demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. Suboptimal performance of some items indicated the need for further validation, particularly of the 13-item version. The AAS can improve evaluation of abortion attitudes in Germany. This may support identification of barriers in healthcare provision and improve care for unintentionally pregnant individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.