ArticlePloS one2026
Family presence during resuscitation: A qualitative study of the experiences of families at the emergency medicine directorate of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Ghana.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Family Presence During Resuscitation (FPDR) is increasingly recognized as a component of patient- and family-centred care, offering emotional support, fostering transparency, and strengthening trust in clinical care. However, in many Sub-Saharan African settings, including Ghana, the practice remains uncommon, undocumented, and lacks policy support. Fewer studies have examined families' experiences with FPDR than those of clinicians. This study explored the lived experiences of Ghanaian families with witnessed resuscitation of their loved ones in a tertiary hospital in Ghana. A qualitative phenomenological approach was adopted to gain in-depth insights into the emotional, cognitive, and social experiences of family members present during resuscitation. Twelve participants were purposively sampled from the Emergency Medicine Directorate of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH). Data were collected through in-depth interviews and field notes and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Three major themes emerged: (1) Emotional Rollercoaster - families experienced shock, helplessness, and anxiety; (2) Uncertainty and Information Asymmetry - participants reported confusion and distress due to lack of communication and comprehension of information given; and (3) Decision Making and Consent - families encountered ethical dilemmas and emotional stress when making critical decisions under pressure. These findings reflect the core principles of patient- and family-centred care in the provision of dignity and respect, information sharing, and collaboration. It also highlights the cultural and emotional significance of FPDR in the Ghanaian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.