ArticlePloS one2026
Artificial intelligence-based modeling for accurate leaf area estimation in olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating olive (Olea europaea L.) leaf area is an important aspect of monitoring plant health and evaluating growth processes in agriculture. Accurate estimation of leaf area allows for a better understanding of processes such as water and nutrient utilization, photosynthesis efficiency, respiration, and yield potential. This study aims to determine the most accurate, easy, and reliable leaf area estimation model using the geometric properties (length and width) of olive leaves. Additionally, the predictive performances of multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) were compared. A total of 1320 leaf samples collected from 22 olive cultivars were used in the study. Leaf length and width were taken as input parameters, and both MLR and ANN models were developed for each cultivar. Both multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models demonstrated high predictive accuracy for olive leaf area estimation across 22 cultivars. The MLR models explained up to 96% of the variation in leaf area using leaf length (LL) and leaf width (LW), with low root mean square errors, indicating strong reliability. When cultivar identity was modeled as a categorical factor through dummy encoding, the model captured significant cultivar-specific effects without altering the overall predictive performance. The ANN models achieved slightly higher accuracy, with determination coefficients exceeding 0.99 and minimal prediction errors, confirming their superior ability to model nonlinear relationships. Across both approaches, leaf width contributed more strongly to leaf area than leaf length. Cultivar-specific differences were statistically significant for only a few genotypes, while most cultivars exhibited comparable patterns after adjustment for multiple testing. In conclusion, both MLR and ANN models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting olive leaf area, with ANN models showing slightly superior performance. However, MLR models also yielded highly reliable results, indicating that both approaches are viable for practical applications in olive cultivation. These predictive models can be effectively used for rapid, non-destructive phenotyping, growth monitoring, and precision management in olive breeding and production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.