ArticlePloS one2026
The role of online peer support in pregnancy: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring pregnant women's experiences of a digital self-care intervention for gestational diabetes mellitus in Vietnam: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnline peer support groups offer virtual spaces where members can share experiences, seek advice, and offer mutual support. While in-person peer support in pregnancy has shown benefits such as improved well-being and reduced isolation, limited research has explored online peer support groups. This scoping review aims to examine the types, contexts, and perceived benefits of online peer support for pregnant people.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in five databases (Embase, Medline PsychInfo, MIDIRS and CINAHL) from inception to December 2024. Eligible studies examined online peer support accessed by pregnant participants with direct interaction. Thematic analysis was applied to identify structural factors influencing the functioning of online peer support groups. The Langford Conceptual Analysis of Social Support was used to categorise type of support.
findingsA total of 27 studies were included. The findings highlighted several structural factors that influence the functioning of online peer support groups for pregnant people. Group size was identified as a key factor, with smaller groups promoting more meaningful interactions. Active moderators supported participant interaction and ensured information quality, while privacy settings, such as closed groups and anonymised participation, fostered safe discussions. Emotional support, such as expressions of empathy, reassurance, and encouragement, was the most reported benefit, followed by informational and appraisal support. Instrumental support was observed less frequently.
conclusionThis scoping review identified key structural factors shaping the design and functioning of online peer support groups for pregnant people. Group size, active moderation, and privacy settings influenced participation and engagement. Further research is recommended to explore how these structural elements impact long-term engagement and overall effectiveness for pregnant people. This project is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number NIHR205347). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.