Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481603›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A protocol for using rapid qualitative techniques to incorporate multi-level stakeholder feedback in a pragmatic clinical trial of mindfulness for chronic low back pain.

Isabel J Roth, Elondra D Harr, Christine R Lathren, Jessica L Barnhill, Ruth D Rodriguez, Jose E Baez, Natalia E Morone

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabel J RothUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4502-3041
Elondra D HarrProgram on Integrative Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Christine R LathrenProgram on Integrative Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jessica L BarnhillProgram on Integrative Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ruth D RodriguezBoston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jose E BaezBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Natalia E MoroneBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8405-5396

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEngaging community members and context experts is increasingly recognized as key to developing research that is responsive to community needs. Here, we describe a protocol for incorporating stakeholder feedback using rapid qualitative techniques into OPTIMUM (Optimizing Pain Treatment In Medical settings Using Mindfulness), a pragmatic clinical trial comparing a telemedicine-delivered mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention to usual care to address chronic low back pain. The aim of this stakeholder feedback supplement to the OPTIMUM parent trial is to consider many viewpoints regarding recruitment, retention, facilitation, delivery, sustainability, and dissemination of this program which are critical to understand before it can be successfully implemented.

methodsOur team developed a multi-faceted approach to collecting feedback from representatives of three levels of influence: individuals, communities, and policy. We plan to conduct focus groups with study participants from both the intervention (MBSR) and usual care groups. We plan to conduct one-time semi-structured interviews with a diverse set of people with varied roles and perspectives (e.g., clinic personnel, health care system leadership, mindfulness instructors, patient pain advocacy groups, policy advocates). We will assemble a Community Advisory Board (CAB) to convene regularly throughout the project. Transcripts from interviews, focus groups, and meeting notes will be analyzed using rapid qualitative methods to facilitate timely incorporation of feedback into the trial. In-depth thematic content analysis will be conducted subsequently. DISCUSSION: Partnering with communities who are historically underrepresented in clinical research under the guidance of principles such as equity, inclusion, trust, and accountability can improve health outcomes that are most relevant and beneficial to the target community, accelerate uptake, and promote sustainability.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainMindfulnessFeedbackFocus GroupsHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41481603
PMCPMC12758753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.