Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481599›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evaluation of RNA extraction and rRNA depletion protocols for RNA-Seq in eleven edible seaweed species from brown, red, and green algae.

Rob J Dekker, Wim A Ensink, Marina F van Olst, Selina M van Leeuwen, Wim C de Leeuw, Martijs J Jonker, Timo M Breit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rob J DekkerRNA Biology research group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2662-8715
Wim A EnsinkRNA Biology research group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marina F van OlstRNA Biology research group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Selina M van LeeuwenRNA Biology research group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wim C de LeeuwRNA Biology research group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijs J JonkerRNA Biology research group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Timo M BreitRNA Biology research group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seaweeds represent a promising resource for food as well as pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. However, genomic and transcriptomic research on these organisms remains underdeveloped, partly due to technical challenges in DNA/RNA extraction and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) depletion. These challenges are particularly acute in species lacking standardized protocols. This study systematically evaluates RNA isolation and rRNA depletion protocols for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) across 11 commercially relevant edible seaweed species, encompassing six brown (Heterokontophyta), four red (Rhodophyta), and one green (Chlorophyta) alga. Seven RNA extraction protocols (three CTAB-based and four spin-column-based) were compared for RNA yield, integrity, and purity. Brown seaweeds generally yielded superior RNA with CTAB-based methods, whereas red and green seaweeds performed better with chaotropic-salt-based spin-column methods. Additionally, three commercial rRNA depletion kits (Ribo-Zero Plant, riboPOOL, and RiboFree) were assessed for each seaweed species separately in a large matrix-style RNA-seq experiment (43 samples) to determine their effectiveness in removing rRNA compared to undepleted controls. Both RiboFree and riboPOOL significantly outperformed Ribo-Zero Plant, yielding post-depletion rRNA mapping rates of only 6, 9, and 19%, respectively. This study provides practical guidelines for selecting RNA isolation and ribodepletion methods tailored to specific seaweed taxa and supports the development of transcriptomic tools for seaweed research.

Indexed as

ChlorophytaPhaeophyceaeRhodophytaRNA, PlantRNA, RibosomalRNA-SeqSeaweedSequence Analysis, RNARNA, PlantRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID41481599
PMCPMC12758695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.