ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of RNA extraction and rRNA depletion protocols for RNA-Seq in eleven edible seaweed species from brown, red, and green algae.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seaweeds represent a promising resource for food as well as pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. However, genomic and transcriptomic research on these organisms remains underdeveloped, partly due to technical challenges in DNA/RNA extraction and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) depletion. These challenges are particularly acute in species lacking standardized protocols. This study systematically evaluates RNA isolation and rRNA depletion protocols for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) across 11 commercially relevant edible seaweed species, encompassing six brown (Heterokontophyta), four red (Rhodophyta), and one green (Chlorophyta) alga. Seven RNA extraction protocols (three CTAB-based and four spin-column-based) were compared for RNA yield, integrity, and purity. Brown seaweeds generally yielded superior RNA with CTAB-based methods, whereas red and green seaweeds performed better with chaotropic-salt-based spin-column methods. Additionally, three commercial rRNA depletion kits (Ribo-Zero Plant, riboPOOL, and RiboFree) were assessed for each seaweed species separately in a large matrix-style RNA-seq experiment (43 samples) to determine their effectiveness in removing rRNA compared to undepleted controls. Both RiboFree and riboPOOL significantly outperformed Ribo-Zero Plant, yielding post-depletion rRNA mapping rates of only 6, 9, and 19%, respectively. This study provides practical guidelines for selecting RNA isolation and ribodepletion methods tailored to specific seaweed taxa and supports the development of transcriptomic tools for seaweed research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.