ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Evaluation of culture- and PCR-based methods for detecting Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples in Thailand.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study ofGeoHealth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBurkholderia pseudomallei is an environmental bacterium that causes melioidosis, a life-threatening disease prevalent in tropical regions. Accurate detection of B. pseudomallei in the environment is essential for identifying areas that pose an infection risk. This study aimed to evaluate culture- and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for detecting B. pseudomallei directly in soil samples, and to assess its environmental prevalence in relation to antibody levels in healthy individuals from Amnat Charoen, Northeast Thailand. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsInitial studies used spiked soil samples to evaluate culture-based methods including Ashdown agar, phosphate-buffered acidic erythritol (ACER) agar, Threonine-basal salt solution with colistin 50 (TBSS-C50) broth, TBSS-C50 based erythritol broth, and ACER broth, and real-time PCR assays targeting BPSS1187 and TTS1-orf2. Hemolysin coregulated protein 1 (Hcp1)-specific antibodies were measured in 398 plasma samples using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Based on these antibody titers, 238 soil samples were collected from the households of individuals that were strongly positive (N = 6) and negative (N = 6) for Hcp1-specific antibodies. B. pseudomallei was isolated from 3.36% (8/238) of soil samples by direct culture on Ashdown agar and from 5.46% (13/238) after enrichment in ACER broth followed by culture on Ashdown agar. Real-time PCR assays confirmed the presence of B. pseudomallei in 2 out of 20 culture-positive soil samples. Overall, B. pseudomallei was detected in 14 of 129 samples (10.9%) from households of seropositive individuals and in 6 of 108 samples (5.5%) from households of seronegative individuals (P = 0.165). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates the importance of using effective methods for detection of B. pseudomallei in environmental samples. For culture-based approaches, enrichment in ACER broth followed by subculture on Ashdown agar demonstrated enhanced bacterial recovery compared to direct culture on Ashdown agar alone. There was limited detection of B. pseudomallei in soil by real-time PCR, and lack of an association between environmental detection methods and human seroprevalence. These findings highlight the need for integrated, multi-dimensional surveillance approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.