Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481566›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue

Donor health beyond donation: cardiovascular risk factors in blood donor populations. A cross-sectional study.

Ivica Marić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ivica Marić

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood donors are often regarded as healthier than the general population, a phenomenon described as the "healthy donor effect". This perception arises from strict donor selection criteria and routine pre-donation screening, yet these evaluations focus largely on hemoglobin, vital signs, and a short medical history, thereby providing only a partial assessment of donor health. As cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading global cause of mortality, assessing cardiovascular risk factors in blood donors provides an opportunity to evaluate whether this group is genuinely healthier or simply appears so due to selection bias. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,543 Slovenian blood donors. All donors completed a medical questionnaire, underwent a physical examination, and vital signs measurements. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from self-reported weight and height. Information on diseases, medication use, smoking, and physical activity was also collected. A subgroup of 506 donors without reported illness and not taking medication was classified as "healthy". This subgroup underwent additional laboratory investigations, including complete blood count, lipoproteins, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. A composite CVD risk score was developed by integrating traditional and novel risk factors.

resultsOverall, 32% of donors reported at least one chronic condition and 19% reported medication use, most frequently antihypertensive therapy. Median BMI was 26.3 kg/m DISCUSSION: Despite eligibility screening, many donors exhibited subclinical CVD risk factors. These findings confirm that transfusion services can contribute beyond donor and recipient safety, offering a valuable platform for prevention and early detection, and strengthening public health surveillance.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsCardiovascular DiseasesHeart Disease Risk FactorsAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesDonor SelectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSloveniaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41481566
PMCPMC12962855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.