Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481510›Full record

ReviewPediatric neurosurgery2026

Modern Aspects of Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring: Utility for Seizure Localization and Therapeutic Decision-Making.

Rohini Coorg, Elaine S Seto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rohini CoorgSection of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Elaine S SetoSection of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA, esseto@bcm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with drug-resistant epilepsy often require invasive monitoring to guide surgical interventions. SUMMARY: Both subdural monitoring and stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) have benefits and limitations in identifying seizure onset and mapping brain function. sEEG allows for more anatomically diffuse sampling, including deep structures like the thalamus. Monitoring leads to a better understanding of epileptic networks and their proximity to eloquent cortex. This often guides the decision between resective/ablative therapies and neuromodulation. There is increasing interest in the use of thalamic stimulation in neuromodulation, although pediatric data are limited. KEY MESSAGE: The increase in invasive monitoring in the USA coupled with the emergence of additional surgical treatments offers new hope to children with refractory epilepsy.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographySeizuresBrain MappingChildHumansEpilepsyNeuromodulationStereoelectroencephalographyThalamus

Identifiers

PMID41481510
PMCPMC13218702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.